All News Stories


[ sort articles by tag ]
Monday
May202013

SUPREME COURT: IRS DOUBLE TAXATION STRUCK DOWN

May 20, 2013:  The United States Supreme Court today unanimously agreed that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) overstepped its discretionary authority and improperly rejected tax credit claims sought by the company for taxes it paid in a foreign country, so-called “double taxation.”

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the unanimous Court, held that the foreign windfall tax falls into a category of income tax recognized in the U.S. and is therefore entitled to credit against U.S. taxes.

Southeastern Legal Foundation, joined by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Goldwater Institute, argued as amici that the IRS Commissioner’s decision to deny the protection against double-taxation broke with decades of administrative decisions and legal precedent favoring tax credits – what the Supreme Court has described as the purpose behind existing federal law “to mitigate the evil of double taxation.”  The “new interpretation” by the IRS Commissioner, which was today rejected by the Court, marked another in a long line of administrative and regulatory overreaching by current Executive branch offices, said Shannon L Goessling, SLF executive director and chief legal counsel.

Counsel of record for the joint amicus brief is Steven G. Bradbury, a Washington, DC- based partner of Dechert LLP and former head of the Office of Legal Counsel for the U.S. Justice Department.

PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Case No. 12-43.

Monday
May132013

New Blockbuster EPA Rulemaking "Unjustified" under Clean Air Act

5-10-13

SLF submits formal comments in a blockbuster U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules docket that proposes radical changes to 36 states' State Implementation Rules (SIPs) governing National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) under the Clean Air Act:

  • EPA has not demonstrated that SIPs used for decades are inadequate - therefore, EPA has no authority to enact new, harsher rules.
  • The "sue and settle" maneuver, starting with a seemingly unrelated federal court lawsuit in the Northern District of California filed by Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians and resulting in new rules docket in Washington, DC designed to cover nearly 80% of the United States, is designed to "fly under the radar" of accepted rulemaking scrutiny.
  • For decades, EPA has approved startup, shutdown, and malfunction provisions in SIPs without interruption - until now.
  • 36 states are now under threat of new, harsh rules that are without precedent - or justified by proof of violation of existing rules.
  • Once again, as with the EPA greenhouse gas emissions (climate change) regulations now before the U.S. Supreme Court, EPA has ignored precedent and grabbed executive/regulatory power beyond that allowed under the Clean Air Act - and without Congressional authorization.

Click here for the SLF Public Comment to EPA Rules Docket

Friday
May102013

A Supreme Court EPA Decision Could Cost Taxpayers $21 Billion a Year, Forbes Magazine

May 8, 2013 - Click here for article

Friday
Apr192013

SLF, et al v. EPA - File Appeal in U.S. Supreme Court on "Global Warming" Rules

Southeastern Legal Foundation today filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court challenging the Obama Administration's EPA regulations on greenhouse gas emissions, the so-called "global warming/climate change" regulations - SLF represents 12 members of Congress, 15 companies and associations, and has been joined in the appeal by Competitive Enterprise Institute, FreedomWorks, and the Science and Environmental Policy Project - $1 trillion and millions of job at stake as SLF challenges the power of the EPA to enact new regulations under the Clean Air Act without congressional authorization - see inside for full brief -

Click here for SLF Supreme Court petition, April 19, 2013

Monday
Feb182013

VOTING RIGHTS ACT CASE BEFORE SUPREME COURT - Shelby County and Clash of the Titans - TownHall.com, 2-18-13

TownHall.com, one of the nation's leading internet news and opinion sites, publishes article by Shannon Goessling, SLF Executive Director and Chief Legal Counsel, on the upcoming United States Supreme Court case challenging enforcement provisions of the Voting Rights Act (Shelby County, AL v. Holder), which will be heard at the end of February 2013.  Goessling discusses the burdens set by ongoing Justice Department oversight of many states and hundreds of local government jurisdictions, despite the failure to present compelling evidence to Congress that voter disenfranchisement and intimidation continue in these jurisdictions.  SLF is participating in the case as amicus.  2-18-13

Click here to read the article

Tuesday
Jan292013

Florida Justices' Case: National Review says, "Won Election, But Not Qualified to be on Ballot" 1-26-13

National Review's Michael James Barton offers on-point analysis about the legal merits in the case filed by Southeastern Legal Foundation on behalf of a Florida citizen against the Florida Secretary of State for qualifying three state Supreme Court Justices to appear on the November 2012 statewide ballot for merit retention despite clear errors in the qualifying process - National Review has followed the cases since filing in mid-2012, and sheds light on the differences between a clear reading of the law and the reticence of some in the Florida judiciary to take action - Click here for the story coverage on January 26, 2013

Tuesday
Jan082013

VOTING RIGHTS ACT, SECT. V UNCONSTITUTIONAL? SLF SUBMITS BRIEF TO U.S. SUPREME COURT IN IMPORTANT CASE

VOTING RIGHTS ACT - SECT. V REAUTHORIZATION UNCONSTITUTIONAL?  U.S. SUPREME COURT REVIEWS 2006 CONGRESSIONAL REAUTHORIZATION OF SECT. V IN SHELBY COUNTY, AL v. ERIC HOLDER, et al.

In 2006, Congress reauthorized Sect. V of the Voting Rights Act using the controversial pre-existing coverage formula found in Sect. IV B of the Act - which, as was laid out by the high court in a 2009 decision, continues to give the federal government powerful oversight over many state and local jurisdictions in the United States despite profound evidence that past discrimination against minorities in voting no longer exists.  SLF, whose brief was cited three times in the 2009 decision by Justice Clarence Thomas, submits an amicus curiae brief in this important case, which will be heard this Spring...

Click here for U.S. Supreme Court brief

Thursday
Dec202012

DC Court Denies Rehearing Petition in Global Warming Cases - On to U.S. Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, DC/ATLANTA, GA (Dec. 20, 2012):  The U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia today denied the petitions for rehearing en banc filed by the states, organizations and corporations challenging the overreach of the Obama administration's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the global warming-greenhouse gas regulations cases.  Statement from Shannon L. Goessling, Southeastern Legal Foundation executive director and chief legal counsel:

"While we are disappointed with the outcome of the rehearing consideration, this is not unexpected. 

We knew that this case would be before the Supreme Court of the United States, and we have been prepared for the rehearing denial. 

We compliment Judges Brown and Kavanaugh for their thorough and sifting dissents, which we believe affirm the clear controversy that the EPA regulations and our combined legal challenges have raised.  As raised so eloquently in a dissenting opinion, Congress has not abdicated its authority to govern and approve regulations, nor has it granted unlimited powers to the Executive branch in the form the EPA to regulate beyond what has been specifically enacted by Congress.

Remember that Congress makes the laws, and the Executive enforces them – the Executive branch offices like EPA are not empowered to overreach and make new laws.  We’re confident the Supreme Court will take this appeal, based on the law and the cases preceding in this issue. 

On behalf of our plaintiffs – including a dozen members of Congress and 14 business and trade associations and companies – as well as the working men and women of America who seek a better economy and not skyrocketing costs, we look at recent Supreme Court decisions on issues related to this matter and take heart that the high court will give these critical challenges a fair, thorough and sifting review, even as the Obama administration continues to take unprecedented steps to reach beyond the letter and intent of existing laws duly enacted by Congress and argues in court that the courts themselves have little authority to review their decisions and enactments.  This is a battle that encompasses both federal government overreach and costly, environmentally meaningless, and devastating climate change regulations."

Click here to download U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rehearing denial order

Tuesday
Nov062012

SPECIAL LEGAL ACTION FILED IN FLORIDA - 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES' QUALIFICATIONS CHALLENGED

On behalf of a Florida voter, Southeastern Legal Foundation files a quo warranto action seeking the Florida Supreme Court to bar the state from certifying the merit retention election results for Florida Supreme Court Justices Lewis, Pariente and Quince, who failed to file full and timely qualifications documents according to state law.  Nov. 6, 2012

Click here to download legal filing

Monday
Oct082012

SCHOOL ADMISSIONS UNDER SCRUTINY IN U.S. SUPREME COURT

Race-based school admissions at the University of Texas-Austin - a program designed to ensure "classroom diversity" rather than student body diversity generally - is the latest in a long line of constitutional race-based government programs that have fallen under court scrutiny.  The Supreme Court of the United States hears oral arguments this week in what legal analysts believe will be a landmark decision.  Southeastern Legal Foundation, participating as amicus in the appeal (Fisher v. UT-Austin, et al.), points out the fallacies of "trendy" programs that stretch the constitutional limits against racial distinctions by governments in the following article published on Oct. 8, 2012 in The Daily Report, Georgia's daily legal newspaper.

Click here for article